Feel It to Heal It: Chronic Pain and Emotions

by Sarah Awareness Pain Relief Recovery Understanding Pain

If you prefer to listen, here’s an audio version of me reading the post:

 

This piece explores how emotions can influence chronic pain. Historically, pain conditions have often been treated as a part of our physical health, while emotions have been treated as separate experiences related to mental health. Increasingly, however, we recognize that this distinction is not so clear-cut.

For decades, pain has been understood through a biopsychosocial lens, which recognizes that our experience of pain is shaped not only by biological factors, but also by psychological and social ones. Likewise, emotions are not simply “mental” experiences. They involve coordinated changes in our brain, nervous system, hormones, muscles, and behaviour. This close relationship is reflected in the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) definition of pain as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage.”

Although pain is distinct from emotion, they share many biological purposes. Both draw our attention to what matters, motivate protective action, and help communicate our needs to others. Pain alerts us to potential bodily harm, motivates us to take action to keep our bodies safe, and can communicate distress in a way that signals a need for help.

A popular take on pain and repressed emotions

If you have spent time exploring mind-body approaches to pain recovery, you have likely come across the work of Dr. John Sarno. Sarno proposed that, for many people, chronic pain could arise primarily from repressed emotions—particularly anger—rather than ongoing tissue damage. He believed that the brain generated pain as a way of protecting people from emotions that felt too threatening to consciously experience. When he believed that someone’s pain was the result of repressed emotions, he would diagnose them with Tension Myositis Syndrome (TMS). Most TMS-related books, podcasts, and online communities trace their roots back to Sarno’s work.

Although research supports a much more nuanced understanding of chronic pain than Sarno originally proposed, his work has had a profound influence. Many people credit his ideas with helping them recover, and his work helped spark broader interest in the relationship between emotions and chronic pain. For example, many people report substantial improvements—or even complete recovery—after reading his book Healing Back Pain: The Mind-Body Connection. Public figures, such as Jimmy Kimmel, Howard Stern, and Larry David, publicly credit Sarno’s work for helping them recover from chronic pain.

Notable people in the pain world helped by Sarno’s work

One notable person helped by Sarno’s work is Nicole Sachs. After Sarno’s work changed her pain and her life, she trained under him, and in her work as a psychotherapist, she has become a popular and influential figure in her own right. Her podcast and YouTube channel branded as The Cure for Chronic Pain, as well as her recent book Mind Your Body: A Revolutionary Program to Release Chronic Pain and Anxiety, share her evolution of Sarno’s work, which continues to place emotional awareness and emotional avoidance at the heart of chronic pain recovery. Again, while the science is more nuanced than the idea that repressed and avoided emotions are often a primary driver of chronic pain, her work has also helped a lot of people. For example, NBA forward Michael Porter Jr. has publicly credited Sachs’ work as playing an important role in his recovery from chronic back pain.

Another notable person helped by Sarno’s work is Alan Gordon. Reading one of Sarno’s books was the beginning of things getting better for him. After recovering from pain, Gordon went on to develop Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT). While inspired by Sarno’s work, PRT places greater emphasis on how the brain can learn to interpret safe sensations as threatening. Fear plays a central role in maintaining this cycle, alongside processes such as attention, expectation, and avoidance. Even though Pain Reprocessing Therapy is relatively new, it is also meaningfully helping people.

I was inspired to train in PRT by one of my own research participants, who fully recovered from 37 years of relatively debilitating pain. Her recovery was supported by PRT and another approach called Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy (EAET). You can read what I wrote about her story here or listen to an interview with her on YouTube here.

Another evolution of Sarno’s work

In addition to Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT), another psychological approach to pain that was influenced by John Sarno’s work is Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy (EAET). Dr. Howard Schubiner, a physician who used to work with Dr. Sarno, developed this approach with Dr. Mark Lumley, a psychologist and researcher, with the goal of developing an evidence-informed approach that incorporated aspects of Sarno’s model alongside advances in pain science. While EAET draws from Sarno, it is also informed by decades of research in emotion science, trauma, attachment, stress physiology, expressive writing, and psychotherapy. EAET helps people identify, experience, and express emotions that may have become difficult to access, tolerate, or communicate, particularly when those emotions are connected to trauma, chronic stress, grief, interpersonal conflict, or other challenging life experiences. Rather than viewing emotions as the sole cause of chronic pain, EAET recognizes that unresolved emotional experiences can be one of many factors that influence how pain develops and persists. Research has demonstrated benefits of EAET for some people with pain conditions such as fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), musculoskeletal pain, and chronic pelvic pain.

What does the research say? And how much does it matter?

Before I look at the research, I want to share something a physician I used to work with once said during a group medical visit. When someone asked about a less common intervention, she responded, “I have seen so many people helped by things that I learned in medical school were hogwash, so I say, as long as it isn’t going to cause you harm, including financial harm, try everything.” Her point was not that evidence does not matter—research most definitely helps us to understand what is most likely to help, for whom, and under what conditions—but that people’s lived experience of healing sometimes extends beyond what research has captured.

For some interventions, there are side effects or risks of serious complications. Simply, there is a cost to the possible gain. With emotion-focused work, there can be risks, including emotional overwhelm or re-traumatization if the work moves too quickly or is not appropriately supported. There are also practical costs, such as time, money, and emotional energy. However, when this work is paced carefully and approached safely, many people find that it improves not only their relationship with pain, but also their overall well-being—even if pain itself does not change.

So, what does the research say?

Research increasingly supports the idea that, for a meaningful subset of people with chronic pain, emotional experiences can influence how the nervous system processes and responds to threat. This may be particularly relevant for people with trauma histories, ongoing interpersonal stress, relational wounds, experiences that have not been fully processed, or patterns of emotional avoidance. Chronic pain is associated with greater emotional avoidance, and efforts to suppress or avoid difficult emotional experiences can, in some circumstances, increase physiological stress responses. Over time, these patterns may contribute to a nervous system that remains more sensitive to threat. It is also important to recognize that the relationship goes both ways. Chronic pain itself can generate difficult emotions, and those emotional responses can then influence how the nervous system processes pain.

Pain and emotions are deeply interconnected. Understanding and working with emotions may positively influence pain for some people and may also improve life even when pain remains. When evaluating approaches to chronic pain, we need to consider more than whether an intervention reduces pain intensity. Pain is only one part of a person’s experience. Improvements in pain-related fear, functioning, relationships, emotional well-being, and quality of life are also meaningful outcomes.

What does emotional work look like?

As the relationship between trauma and chronic pain becomes more widely recognized, one misinterpretation of this work is believing that we need to find the one buried trauma or emotion that is causing our pain. Emotional work is not about digging endlessly into the past to find the hidden reason you are in pain. It is also not about forcing yourself to feel emotions or trying not to feel certain harder-to-feel emotions. Emotions like anger, grief, and despair can be difficult to feel, and feeling these things is a part of being human. Emotional work is about developing a different relationship with your internal experiences—learning to notice, understand, tolerate, and respond to emotions with greater awareness and compassion. It is not about forcing yourself to feel more. It is about creating enough safety that what has been difficult to feel can become more feelable. Effective emotional processing happens within a window where you are connected to the emotion but still able to stay present and grounded.

How can we do this work?

Two potentially helpful ways of working with emotions are expressive writing and therapy. While these approaches look different, both can help us develop a greater awareness of our internal experiences and create space for emotions that may have been difficult to process. For some people, expressive writing is enough to begin this process. For others, emotions connected to pain may feel too complex, overwhelming, or difficult to access alone. This is where therapy can be helpful.

Expressive writing

Expressive writing was developed by social psychologist James Pennebaker as a research-based writing intervention exploring how putting difficult experiences into words affects health and well-being. It is a writing practice that focuses on approaching difficult experiences, putting emotions into words, creating a coherent narrative about our experience, and allowing ourselves to acknowledge what happened. Creating a coherent narrative does not mean creating a positive story or minimizing what happened. It means helping the brain organize an experience that may have felt confusing, overwhelming, or unfinished.

Common forms of journaling that are different from expressive writing include recording the events of your day, repeatedly venting without reflection, analyzing why you feel bad, and trying to write well.

Expressive writing can be done in many different ways, but here is a basic framework that might be helpful to start:

  • Set aside 15-20 minutes
  • Write continuously without worrying about grammar or structure
  • Focus on a difficult experience, emotion, or ongoing struggle
  • Include your thoughts, feelings, body sensations, and meaning
  • If you become overwhelmed, pause and use a grounding practice before deciding whether to continue.

Again, this process is not about forcing yourself to feel more. As emphasized above, it is about learning to notice, understand, tolerate, and respond to emotions with greater awareness and compassion. The goal is not to get rid of difficult emotions, but to develop a different relationship with them. Research on expressive writing has found a range of physical and psychological benefits, although the effects vary depending on the population, the type of writing intervention, and the outcomes being measured.

Nicole Sachs has a specific approach to expressive writing that some people really like. It is different from the expressive writing protocols that have been studied in research settings, but as discussed above, anecdotally, it has helped many people. It is called Journal Speak, and she teaches about it in YouTube videos and podcast episodes, as well as in the book I mentioned above.

A note for consideration: For people with significant trauma histories, intense emotional writing can sometimes bring up more than they are prepared to process alone. In those cases, working with a trained therapist may provide the support needed to approach these experiences safely.

Therapy

Therapy is one place where we can develop skills such as emotional awareness, emotional acceptance, and emotional expression. Foundationally, emotional awareness can be about emotional literacy—recognizing and naming what we are feeling. People with alexithymia generally have a hard time experiencing, identifying, and expressing emotions. Although not everyone with chronic pain experiences difficulties with emotional awareness, alexithymia is associated with greater pain intensity among adults with chronic pain.

As we begin to grow our capacity to recognize emotions, we can also expand our understanding of our emotional experience. One question I often ask people is, “How do you know that you are feeling ______?” As touched on above, emotions are not just mental experiences. They involve changes in our brain, nervous system, hormones, muscles, and behaviour. Part of emotional awareness is noticing these shifts. A deeper layer of emotional awareness is when we begin to learn from what we are feeling. Emotions are information—not necessarily facts—about what we want, what we don’t want, what we value, and when something needs to change.

Emotional acceptance, another skill that can be developed in therapy, is about moving away from fighting, judging, and fearing our feelings. Rather than being critical of ourselves for feeling certain things, we move towards what we are feeling with curiosity and compassion. This involves recognizing, as noted above, that our feelings are experiences we can learn from. Acceptance does not mean liking an experience, giving up on change, or deciding that things will always be this way. It means making room for what is present so that we can respond more effectively. Self-compassion practices weave in wonderfully here because they emphasize how human it is to feel the full range of human emotions. We don’t live a human life and escape the ones that are hard or uncomfortable to feel.

The final skill I will touch on here is emotional expression. Here we move beyond our own relationship with our emotions and bring our emotions into our relationship with others. When we can share what we are feeling with others, it opens the possibility for deeper connection and for the experience of truly feeling seen and understood.

A final note

Please remember the comment I made above about pacing this work. At the heart of this emotional work is safety learning—learning that we can safely experience emotions that have felt overwhelming, threatening, or difficult to tolerate. As I emphasize in this post on danger and safety learning, “Safety learning is most effective when experiences are tolerable, believable, and repeatable. Too much too fast may reinforce danger. A helpful idea for this work is: go slow to go fast.”

Step gently into this work. Take care of yourself. Ask for help. In many ways, our own emotions can be one of the scariest things we encounter. It’s okay to feel afraid.

Working with emotions is not about finding a single hidden cause of pain or forcing ourselves to relive difficult experiences. It is about building a safer, more compassionate relationship with our internal world. For some people, this may change their experience of pain. For others, it may bring greater freedom, connection, and quality of life alongside pain. Either way, learning to listen to ourselves can be a meaningful part of healing.

 

Recovery Through Relearning: Chronic Symptoms as Protective Responses

by Sarah Pain Relief Recovery Understanding Pain

If you’ve spent time learning about pain, you may have come across Lorimer Moseley, a well-known pain researcher from Australia. His work is widely recommended in pain education programs, and you can explore some of it on the Learn About Pain page of my website.

Moseley is now applying what we’ve learned about pain to a broader group of conditions he calls the “Five Big Protective Disorders”: pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress. When chronic, he suggests that all of these conditions may be protective responses that have become overprotective and persistent. Here’s a quick overview of how these responses can be protective:

  • Pain – Pain captures our attention so we can protect a potentially injured or threatened body part. It motivates action to increase safety.
  • Fatigue – Fatigue helps conserve energy, promote recovery, and encourage rest when the system perceives depletion or threat.
  • Anxiety – Anxiety increases vigilance and prepares us to detect and avoid potential danger.
  • Low mood/depression – Low mood can reduce activity, risk-taking, and effort during times of loss, significant stress, or overwhelm.
  • Post-traumatic stress – After a threatening or overwhelming experience, the nervous system may stay on high alert. Hypervigilance, avoidance, and strong emotional reactions are all ways the body tries to prevent future harm.

Recovery as relearning

When we think about these conditions as persistent overprotection, recovery begins to look different. Rather than focusing solely on symptom reduction or tissue repair, recovery becomes about learning—helping the brain and nervous system update outdated predictions about danger and safety. In other words, recovery becomes less about “fixing what is broken” and more about retraining a system that has tried so hard to keep us safe that it has learned to protect too much.

Danger learning and safety learning

It can be helpful to frame this retraining as danger learning and safety learning. Danger learning occurs when the brain learns to perceive something as a threat. Danger learning happens quickly, promoting immediate survival by creating strong, fast-acting fear responses.

In contrast, safety learning is slower, requiring repeated experiences to teach the brain that a situation is no longer hazardous, effectively inhibiting fear responses over time. It involves helping the brain and nervous system update their predictions by learning, “This is safe—I don’t need this level of protection here.” The goal is not to eliminate protection, but to help the system respond more accurately, reserving protective responses for genuine danger rather than learned or outdated threats.

Explicit learning and implicit learning

It’s also helpful to distinguish between two different ways of learning: explicit learning and implicit learning.

Explicit learning is conscious, verbal, and logical. It’s the kind of learning where you can say, “I know this,” or “I understand this.”

Implicit learning is unconscious, emotional, sensory, and experiential. It shapes gut reactions, habits, conditioned responses, and automatic feelings of safety or danger—often outside conscious awareness. It’s learning that comes through experience.

Understanding these two ways of learning matters because many chronic protective responses are rooted in implicit danger learning. We might not think we are in danger, and in fact, we might know that we are safe. But, on an unconscious, implicit level, our nervous system is still predicting danger. Lasting change often requires implicit safety learning—new lived experiences that help the nervous system genuinely update how it identifies and predicts threat.

A note on embodiment and learning

Embodiment is the experience of being connected to and aware of your body, emotions, sensations, and internal experience—and allowing that experience to inform how you relate to yourself and the world around you. Many people learn to disconnect from aspects of their bodily and emotional experience as a way of surviving difficult or overwhelming experiences, especially early in life. This disconnection is often adaptive and protective.

Explaining embodiment fully deserves its own post, but it’s important to briefly mention here because embodiment can help bridge explicit and implicit learning. When we are more connected to our internal experience, intellectual understanding is more likely to become felt and integrated—not just something we think, but something the nervous system begins to experience as true. This is part of why practices that support embodiment—such as therapy, mindfulness, somatic work, and other mind-body approaches—can play such an important role in healing.

More about danger learning

While we often think of more obvious dangers as threats (things like physical injury or unsafe situations), the brain can also learn to interpret a remarkably wide range of experiences as threatening. Below, I’ve listed examples of common places (with a few examples of each) to find danger learning.

  • Movement: specific movements (bending, lifting, twisting), general activities (walking), repetitive tasks (sitting to standing)
  • Body sensations: tightness, tingling, fatigue, dizziness, heart rate changes, gut sensations
  • Contexts or environments: driving, workplaces, social situations, medical settings, crowds
  • Emotions: stress, anger, sadness, grief, overwhelm
  • Thoughts: “I can’t do this,” “This is getting worse,” “I won’t be able to cope,” “What’s the point?”
  • Time-based patterns: time of day, duration of activity, anticipated crashes or flare-ups
  • Social and relational experiences: conflict, feeling misunderstood, encountering or being around certain people, asking for help, feeling judged
  • Sensory input: light, sound, smell, temperature
  • Food: specific foods, hydration, meal timing, portion size
  • Sleep: difficulty falling asleep, waking during the night, poor sleep quality
  • Medical: diagnoses, imaging findings, practitioner language, previous medical trauma

The brain can learn to associate almost anything with danger. In Lorimer Moseley’s framework, these learned danger cues are called DIMs, which stands for danger-in-me. Because many DIMs are learned implicitly through past experiences, we can be completely unaware of them. Some are obvious, while others can be surprisingly subtle and tricky to find.

Mapping your own danger learning

Pain is not a direct measure of tissue damage. Rather, pain is a protective alarm that sounds when the brain perceives that the body might be in danger. This means that understanding what your brain has learned to associate with danger can be an essential part of recovery—not just for chronic pain, but for many persistent protective symptoms. 

A helpful starting point is to gently begin identifying your own DIMs. This is not about judging whether your brain’s associations are rational or accurate. It’s simply about understanding the protective patterns your system has learned. Awareness creates the foundation for change.

More about safety learning

We can use safety learning to retrain a system that has become overprotective, and it is important to think about learning safety both explicitly and implicitly.

Explicit safety learning

Explicit safety learning involves conscious, cognitive understanding. This kind of learning can happen through books, courses, podcasts, therapy, or educational conversations. In the context of chronic pain, fatigue, anxiety, or other protective symptoms, learning about the neuroscience behind these conditions and about how these protective systems work can reduce fear, create hope, and begin shifting harmful beliefs. Reading this blog post is an example of explicit safety learning.

Implicit safety learning

You may consciously know you are safe, but deeper parts of your nervous system may still respond as though danger is present. The brain’s protective systems are most powerfully updated through repeated, credible experiences of safety rather than from information alone. In other words, recovery often requires helping the body and nervous system experience safety often enough that protection no longer feels necessary.

This helps explain why insight alone may not fully resolve chronic symptoms. You can understand pain science, believe in mind-body recovery, and yet still experience symptoms if your implicit protective system has not yet updated.

How implicit safety learning happens

Safety learning often involves intentionally creating experiences that provide the brain with new evidence: evidence that movement, sensations, emotions, or situations may be safer than previously predicted. Safety learning is most effective when experiences are tolerable, believable, and repeatable. Too much too fast may reinforce danger. A helpful idea for this work is: go slow to go fast. Safety learning may be supported by:

  • Graded exposure
  • Somatic tracking
  • Emotional exposure
  • Corrective experiences
  • Play
  • Pleasure
  • Self-compassion
  • Nervous system regulation
  • Graded activity
  • Connection

We want to give our nervous systems repeated experiences that contradict danger predictions. In other words, we want to experience safety repeatedly until the nervous system updates. Over time, we will increase our safety cues, or what Lorimer Moseley refers to as SIMs—safety-in-me. And when our brain perceives there to be more credible evidence of safety than of danger, the protective responses will no longer be needed.

How therapy can support safety learning

Therapy can support both explicit and implicit safety learning, and it can also help uncover danger learning that is more difficult to recognize on our own. Put simply, therapy can help make the implicit more explicit—bringing automatic or outside-of-awareness patterns into awareness.

On an explicit level, therapy can help people make sense of their symptoms through a new lens: learning about protective responses, danger learning, and the ways the nervous system adapts through experience.

Fully explaining how therapy supports implicit learning would require another lengthy post. But, in short, experiential approaches to therapy help bring older protective patterns into awareness while creating new experiences that gently challenge and update them. This can be especially important for people with histories of relational trauma. Over time, the therapeutic relationship itself can become a place where vulnerability feels safer and connection becomes possible without as much protection.

As this happens, emotions that once felt overwhelming may become more tolerable, and body sensations may feel less threatening. Rather than simply trying to eliminate symptoms, therapy can support the gradual retraining of a system that has learned to expect danger—helping the brain and body rediscover safety, flexibility, and trust through lived experience.

Somatic Tracking: A Powerful Tool for Pain

by Sarah Pain Relief

What is somatic tracking?

Somatic tracking is a gentle practice that involves curiously paying attention to sensations in the body without trying to change them. It comes from Pain Reprocessing Therapy, a psychological approach to chronic pain, and it also supports broader brain retraining processes used in the treatment of many chronic health conditions. In Pain Reprocessing Therapy, fear is seen as a fuel for pain, and somatic tracking directly works with fear by retraining our brain to interpret more experiences as safe.

Why practice somatic tracking?

Because ongoing challenges with pain tend to impact our lives negatively, pain sensations themselves can become increasingly perceived as a threat. When pain itself is activating our system, it can start a pain-fear cycle that progressively makes things worse. When pain triggers fear or a perception of threat, the nervous system moves into higher alert. This increased vigilance amplifies the protective response of pain, which leads to further increases in fear or perception of threat—and the cycle continues.

The aim of somatic tracking is to break the pain-fear cycle by retraining the brain to have a different relationship with the pain sensations. Over time, somatic tracking helps the brain learn that pain sensations don’t require danger responses, which can reduce pain intensity and frequency.

So, somatic tracking changes pain?

Importantly, with somatic tracking, we are not trying to force pain to change in the moment; we are supporting long-term change by teaching the brain that sensations are safer than it expects. Rather than trying to force pain to go away, we focus on learning to feel safe while feeling painful sensations. Many people experience meaningful pain relief through this approach.

Some people notice changes quickly, while for others, this is a gradual process of building safety and confidence with their body. Somatic tracking is not about pushing through pain or forcing yourself to tolerate sensations. It is done gradually, with choice and safety. In fact, somatic tracking is only recommended when pain levels are mild or moderate—not when they are high.

A note on the word sensations.

In Pain Reprocessing Therapy, we’re encouraged to change our language. Instead of using the word pain, we use the word sensations. Why? Because the word pain, itself, is often linked to danger and threat. The more neutral word sensations helps the brain learn that this sensory experience is safe.

What does somatic tracking involve?

Somatic tracking has three components: mindfulness, safety reappraisal, and positive affect induction. Below, I briefly explain these three components in the way that they are generally described and provide an overview of the way I currently explain them to people in session.

It is worth noting that the principles of somatic tracking can be applied in different ways to all sorts of different experiences – pain, fatigue, anxiety, insomnia, and more.

The three components of somatic tracking

Somatic tracking can be done for longer periods of time, as well as in brief moments throughout the day. It involves weaving together and moving back and forth between the three different components. Outside of not being recommended when pain is high, generally, the more you practice, the better.

Mindfulness

  • Observe the sensations with a curious and non-judgemental attitude.
  • Notice the characteristics and the location of the sensations, as well as how they move or change.
  • Attend to the sensations without trying to fix, change, or escape them.

Safety reappraisal

  • Actively communicate messages of safety to your brain.
  • Remember that pain is a protective alarm warning you of the possible need to protect your body. Remind yourself that there is nothing you need to do right now to protect your body—nothing you need to run from, nothing you need to fight. You are safe enough in this moment.

Positive affect induction

  • Foster a lighthearted and positive emotional state. This makes it easier to attend to sensations through a lens of safety and positivity and signal to your nervous system that there is no emergency.
  • Positive affect doesn’t have to mean happiness or joy—it can be as simple as curiosity, neutrality, or a slight sense of steadiness.
  • Some common ways to induce this state include humour, visualization, recalling pleasant memories, and engaging in comforting activities.

Working with the three components

Mindfulness: Mapping the territory

Imagine you are a curious explorer meeting these sensations for the first time, and you want to understand them well enough to draw a very detailed map. You might first begin by noticing where the sensations are and where they aren’t. You might imagine intensity to be like sea level, noticing if there is variation across the sensations or if it is more of a flat, prairie-like experience. You could imagine different qualities of sensation (e.g., tingling, achy, tight) to be like different terrains (e.g., rainforest, desert). And throughout your practice, you may need to revise your mapping as your experience shifts. Stay open to the possibility that you might notice things about these sensations that you have never noticed before.

Safety reappraisal: Safety in mind

Imagine a spectrum of safety perception. On one extreme, we perceive ourselves as safe, and on the other, we perceive ourselves to be in immediate threat of significant danger. With safety reappraisal, we are trying to shift in the direction of perceiving ourselves as safe through what we do with our mind. The primary tool here is our thoughts. The type of thoughts people use can vary a lot and are influenced by factors such as the nature of their pain and their understanding of pain. It’s about what works for you.

Some examples of thoughts used for this practice include:

  • This is uncomfortable but not dangerous.
  • My body is safe (or my body is safe enough).
  • There is nothing I need to do right now to protect my body—nothing I need to fight, nothing I need to run from.
  • This is just a sensation.

Positive affect induction: Safety in body

With positive affect induction, we are exploring what we can do to increase our perception of safety through our body or nervous system. There are many ways to do this work—and different approaches work better for different people. Some people use imagination or visualization to connect with something that helps settle or soften their system. Imagining yourself in nature, with adorable animals, surrounded by loved ones, in a favourite place, or doing a favourite activity are a few examples. Recalling memories that bring a smile to your face or thinking about things that make you laugh. Anything that cues your awareness to the fact that you are not running from a threat—deep breaths, feeling your feet on the floor or your hips in your chair, placing a hand on your chest—could work well.

With safety in body work, it’s important to consider any history of trauma. For people who have experienced trauma, cues that are meant to increase safety may sometimes feel uncomfortable, inaccessible, or even activating. This is not a sign that something is wrong—it simply means the nervous system learned, for good reasons, to stay alert. In these cases, trauma integration and healing may be an important part of gradually increasing the body’s sense of safety, and this work is always approached with choice, pacing, and care.

Learn more about somatic tracking

Here are a few resources for learning more:

Practice somatic tracking

The free meditation app Insight Timer has many guided somatic tracking practices. I have a therapist profile on this app, and through my profile, you can find a folder of somatic tracking practices that I think might be helpful ones to work with.

I also guide somatic tracking practices in session, and if you work with me in that context, you are more than welcome to record the practices I guide in session.

*If you follow my therapist profile on the app, here is how to access the folders that I’ve put together: Teachers > My Teachers > Teachers